Rolling Stones ‘Charlie is My Darling’ Filmmakers Discuss Documentary’s Long Road to Release
Rolling Stones‘ 1965 tour documentary ‘Charlie is My Darling‘
is finally getting a full scale release courtesy of Abkco Films and
filmmakers Mick Gochanour and Robin Klein. You can get an exclusive
sneak peek at the film for the next 24 hours at charlieismydarling.com/sneakpeek.
The film, which arrives on Nov. 6, captures the moment just before the Stones became superstars, as ‘Satisfaction’ had just hit No. 1 on the charts. The group were filmed while on a 1965 tour of Ireland, but apart from a brief release the following year, the footage had remained in storage until now. We spoke to Gochanour and Klein about the massive amount of work that went into restoring and re-editing the film, and what they learned about the Rolling Stones during the process. You can get more information about ‘Charlie is My Darling’ at Abkco’s official site.
The restoration of the picture was also a monumental task. There was significant damage — over and under exposure, negative, work print — some 90,000 frames that had to be hand-restored. Since we were dealing with positive and negative, we were dealing with both black and white lines, chemical damage that occurred during processing, and just sheer age. A lot of the film was brittle with age and required special treatment in order to be scanned at 2K. At the end of the day our goal was to get wildly different sourced and damaged footage up to respectable standards and to make it look like it was all part of the same film.
And the audio was equally as challenging, (coming from) many sources: ¼” nagra tapes, three track masters, optical audio from the film. Warpage and noise were a constant battle.
Forty-seven years after it was filmed, the The film, which arrives on Nov. 6, captures the moment just before the Stones became superstars, as ‘Satisfaction’ had just hit No. 1 on the charts. The group were filmed while on a 1965 tour of Ireland, but apart from a brief release the following year, the footage had remained in storage until now. We spoke to Gochanour and Klein about the massive amount of work that went into restoring and re-editing the film, and what they learned about the Rolling Stones during the process. You can get more information about ‘Charlie is My Darling’ at Abkco’s official site.
When were you first aware of the original film?
The project started over a decade ago, tracking down the various elements from the director Peter Whitehead, producer Andrew Loog Oldham, Abkco’s archives, the Rolling Stones archives and various bootleggers. In reviewing all of the above, we discovered thousands of feet of unused outtakes, as well as a significant number of live performances which had never been used in the numerous bootleg versions that were previously available.What drew you to this project?
We had been aware of the project since its inception in 1965. We tried to bring it to life in the ’90s but the technology and time to sort through all materials just wasn’t there yet. In 2012, with the advantage of new technology and 50 years of hindsight we thought it was worth taking a stab at it again. What began as a restoration piece turned in to an archeologist’s expedition and resulted in a new piece of work. The advances in technology and the creative forces aligned enabling us to release the film as you see it today.What were the creative and technical challenges involved with assembling the new cut of this film?
The technical challenges were enormous in assembling this new cut. We spent around 8 months just syncing the newly discovered footage. The first chore was to sync the picture to the audio. There was at least three times as much original 1/4″ tape as there was picture. It was a meticulous, painstaking process of looking for clues: lip reading, a gesture, a tempo, words said on camera — very painful, but it was necessary to see if we had enough picture to create performances — and we did!!!!The restoration of the picture was also a monumental task. There was significant damage — over and under exposure, negative, work print — some 90,000 frames that had to be hand-restored. Since we were dealing with positive and negative, we were dealing with both black and white lines, chemical damage that occurred during processing, and just sheer age. A lot of the film was brittle with age and required special treatment in order to be scanned at 2K. At the end of the day our goal was to get wildly different sourced and damaged footage up to respectable standards and to make it look like it was all part of the same film.
And the audio was equally as challenging, (coming from) many sources: ¼” nagra tapes, three track masters, optical audio from the film. Warpage and noise were a constant battle.