Monday, October 24, 2011

'THE STONES ON THE ED SULLIVAN SHOW'...

In rotation: 'The Rolling Stones on the Ed Sullivan Show'

A series in Sunday Calendar about what Times writers & contributors are listening to right now...

In rotation: 'The Rolling Stones on the Ed Sullivan Show'

Those who know of the Rolling Stones' early history on “The Ed Sullivan Show” are most likely familiar with their 1967 performance of “Let's Spend the Night Together,” on which they were required to change the chorus to “Let's spend some time together” to appease the network's censors. But the band appeared on the hugely popular American show six times throughout the '60s, and these performances, along with the entire episodes and the commercials surrounding them, are featured on the new double-disc collection “The Rolling Stones on the Ed Sullivan Show.”

The release captures the band at its sassiest and sexiest, when Mick Jagger and Keith Richards had bowl haircuts — and Richards looked about 12 years old — and the band played a brand of rock 'n' roll that had yet to go through its LSD phase, and the mere shimmy of Jagger's striped slacks would make the ladies go crazy.

In addition to the time-machine feel of witnessing the world's greatest rock band as it rose, the shows, which span from 1964 through 1969 (when, by then, at least a few members of the band look to have discovered LSD), offers great context. Before one of the Stones' 1965 appearances, blue-eyed soul singer Dusty Springfield performed an early hit; and on the episode featuring the Stones doing “(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction,” actor Hal Holbrook recites Lincoln's second inaugural address — in prime time (times sure have changed).

By their last appearance in 1969, the band had longer hair, more attitude and freakier clothes. They sing “Gimme Shelter,” “Love in Vain,” and “Honky Tonk Women,” Jagger wears an amazing flowered choker around his neck and Richards is more … laid back. Those five years had done a number on the band, and the band had done a number on culture, and the result is a fascinating look at a group coming into its own.

The Rolling Stones
“The Rolling Stones on the Ed Sullivan Show” (DVD)

HAPPY BIRTHDAY BILL WYMAN 24/10/1936 (75)























Bill Wyman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bill Wyman

Wyman with Bill Wyman's Rhythm Kings
Middelburg, January 2009 Photo: Jacco Barth
Background information
Birth name William George Perks
Also known as Lee Wyman
Born 24 October 1936 (age 75)
Lewisham, London
England
United Kingdom
Genres Rock and roll, R&B, swing, jazz, blues, skiffle
Occupations Musician, composer, author, record producer, film producer, bandleader, photographer, inventor
Instruments Upright bass, electric bass, keyboards, piano, guitar, percussion, vocals
Years active 1962–present
Labels Velvel, Koch International, Rolling Stones, BMG
Associated acts The Rolling Stones, Bill Wyman's Rhythm Kings, Wilie & the Poor Boys, The Cliftons
Website billwyman.com
Notable instruments
Framus Star Bass
Vox Teardrop bass
Fender Mustang Bass
Ampeg Dan Armstrong

Bill Wyman (born William George Perks; 24 October 1936) is an English musician best known as the bass guitarist for the English rock and roll band The Rolling Stones from 1962 until 1992. Since 1997, he has recorded and toured with his own band, Bill Wyman's Rhythm Kings. He has worked producing both records and film, and has scored music for film in movies and television.

Wyman has kept a journal since he was a child after World War II. It has been useful to him as an author who has written seven books, selling two million copies. Wyman's love of art has additionally led to his proficiency in photography and his photographs have hung in galleries around the world.[1] Wyman's lack of funds in his early years led him to create and build his own fretless bass guitar. He became an amateur archaeologist and enjoys relic hunting; The Times published a letter about his hobby (Friday 2 March 2007). He designed and markets a patented Bill Wyman signature metal detector, which he has used to find relics dating back to era of the Roman Empire in the English countryside. As a businessman, he owns several establishments including the famous Sticky Fingers Café, a rock & roll-themed bistro serving American cuisine first opened in 1989 in the Kensington area of London and later, two additional locations in Cambridge and Manchester, England.

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Early life

Bill Wyman was born in Lewisham Hospital in Lewisham, South London, the son of William Perks, a bricklayer, and his wife, Molly. One of five children, Wyman spent most of his early life living in a terraced house in one of the roughest streets in Sydenham, southeast London. He describes his childhood as "scarred by poverty".[2]

He attended Beckenham and Penge Grammar School from 1947 to Easter 1953, leaving before the GCE exams after his father found him a job working for a bookmaker and insisted that he take it.

[edit] Music career

Wyman took piano lessons from age 10 to 13. A year after his marriage on 24 October 1959 to Diane Cory, an 18-year-old bank clerk, he bought a Burns electric guitar for £52 on hire-purchase, but was not satisfied by his progress.[3] After hearing a bass guitar at The Barron Knights' concert, he fell in love with the sound of it and decided this was his instrument. He created what may have been the first fretless electric bass[4] by removing the frets from a bass guitar he was reworking, and played this in a south London band, The Cliftons. He used the stage name Lee (later Bill) Wyman, taking the surname of a friend with whom he had done National Service in the Royal Air Force from 1955 to 1957.[5]

[edit] The Rolling Stones

When drummer Tony Chapman told him that a rhythm and blues band called The Rolling Stones needed a bass player, he auditioned and was hired on 7 December 1962 as a successor to Dick Taylor. The band were impressed by his instrument and amplifiers (one of which Wyman built himself), but because he was married, employed, and older, Wyman remained an outsider.[6]

The Rolling Stones tour, 23 July 1975 Wood, left, Richards and Jagger visible

In addition to playing bass, Wyman frequently sang harmony on early records, and through 1967 in concert as well. He sang lead vocals on the track "In Another Land", on the Their Satanic Majesties Request album and a single. The song is one of two Wyman compositions released by the Rolling Stones; the second is "Downtown Suzie" (sung by Mick Jagger), on Metamorphosis, a collection of Rolling Stones outtakes. The title "Downtown Suzie" was chosen by the Rolling Stones' erstwhile manager Allen Klein without consulting Wyman or the band. The original title was "Sweet Lyle Lucy", named after Lyle Street, a street in the red light district in Soho, London.

Wyman kept a journal throughout his life, beginning when he was a child, and used it in writing his 1990 autobiography Stone Alone and his 2002 book Rolling with the Stones. In Stone Alone, Wyman claims to have composed the riff of "Jumpin' Jack Flash" with Brian Jones and drummer Charlie Watts. Wyman mentions that "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction" was released as a single only after a 3-2 vote within the band: Wyman, Watts and Jones voted for, Jagger and Richards against, feeling it not sufficiently commercial. By the 1970s, Wyman, tired of the monopolisation of songwriting and production by Jagger and Richards,[citation needed] began solo projects. In the 1970s and early 80s he made three solo albums, none commercially very successful but all well received by critics.[citation needed] In July 1981 his "(Si, Si) Je Suis Un Rock Star" became a top-20 hit in many countries.[7]

Wyman also played on The London Howlin' Wolf Sessions, released 1971, with Howlin' Wolf, Eric Clapton, Charlie Watts and Stevie Winwood, and on the album Jamming with Edward, released in 1972, with Ry Cooder, Nicky Hopkins, Mick Jagger and Charlie Watts.

Wyman composed the score of the 1981 Ryan O'Neal-Omar Sharif film Green Ice; and in the mid-80s, he composed music for two films by Italian director Dario Argento: Phenomena (1985) and Terror at the Opera (1987). He made a cameo appearance in the 1987 film Eat the Rich. He produced and managed the group Tucky Buzzard.

Wyman was close to Brian Jones; he and Watts were the only members at Jones' funeral in July 1969. Wyman was also friends with guitarist Mick Taylor. Like the Rolling Stones he has worked with Taylor after Taylor's departure from the band.

After the Rolling Stones' 1989-90 Steel Wheels/Urban Jungle tours, Wyman left the band; his decision was announced in December 1992.[8] The Rolling Stones have continued to record and tour with Darryl Jones on bass.

[edit] Recent activity

Wyman continues to tour with The Rhythm Kings, which has featured such musicians as Martin Taylor,[9] Albert Lee, Gary Brooker, Terry Taylor (formerly with Tucky Buzzard), Mike Sanchez and Georgie Fame. Following his 70th birthday in October 2006, Wyman undertook another British tour.

On 10 December 2007, Wyman and his band appeared alongside a reunited Led Zeppelin at the Ahmet Ertegun Tribute Concert at The O2 in London.

Wyman was a judge for the 5th annual Independent Music Awards to support independent artists' careers.[10]

In 2009, ex-Rolling Stones guitarist Mick Taylor was invited as a guest performer with Wyman's Rhythm Kings.

On 25 October 2009, Wyman performed a reunion show with Faces, filling in for the late Ronnie Lane as he had previously done in 1986 and 1993.[11][12]

On 19 April 2011, pianist Ben Waters released an Ian Stewart tribute album titled Boogie 4 Stu. Wyman played on two tracks: "Rooming House Boogie" and "Watchin' the River Flow", the latter recorded with the Rolling Stones.

[edit] Musical instruments

Wyman, on bass during The Rolling Stones tour in 1975

Wyman's bass sound came not only from his home-made fretless bass, but the "walking bass" style he adopted, inspired by Willie Dixon and Ricky Fenson.[citation needed] His tight work with Watts anchored the Rolling Stones, exemplifying the "heartbeat and pulse" idea behind ideal rhythm sections.[citation needed] Wyman has played a number of basses, including a Framus Star bass, a Vox Teardrop bass (issued as a Bill Wyman signature model), a Fender Mustang Bass, two Ampeg Dan Armstrong basses, a Gibson SG Bass, a Rickenbacker 4005 copy, and a Travis Bean bass. His current favourite is a Steinberger bass. Wyman's amplifers over the years have included a Vox T-60, a piggyback Fender Bassman, a Hiwatt bass stack, and an Ampeg SVT. Wyman, especially in the early Stones' years, had a distinctive way of holding his bass - almost vertical. He stated that the reason he held a bass in this position is simply because his hands were small.

[edit] Personal life

Wyman, although moderate in his use of alcohol and drugs, has stated that he became "girl mad" as a psychological crutch.[13] Maxim magazine ranked Wyman at number 10 on its "Living Sex Legends" list, as he is reputed to have had sex with over 1000 women.[14]

Wyman married his first wife, Dianne, in 1959, and shared a son, Stephen Paul Wyman (29 March 1962). They separated in 1967 and divorced in 1969.[15]

From 1967 through 1983, Wyman was romantically linked to Astrid Lundström.

On 2 June 1989 Wyman married 18-year-old Mandy Smith, whom he had been dating since she was 13. Their relationship was the subject of considerable media attention. The marriage ended in spring 1991, although the divorce was not finalised until 1993.[16] In 1993, while Wyman was still married to Smith, Stephen, his son from his first marriage, became engaged to Smith's mother.[17]

In April 1993 he married Suzanne Accosta. They are still married and have three daughters, Katherine Noelle (September 1994), Jessica Rose (November 1995) and Matilda Mae (May 1998).[18]

Wyman lives in a country house in Suffolk and in St. Paul de Vence in the south of France; in St. Paul de Vence his friends include numerous artists. He is a cricket supporter (as is Mick Jagger), and played in a celebrity match at The Oval against a former England XI, taking a hat-trick.[19][20]

Wyman started selling metal detectors in 2007.[21] Treasure detecting adventures in the British Isles are detailed in his 2005 illustrated book Treasure Islands co-written with Richard Havers.[22][23]

Wyman is a keen photographer. He has taken photographs throughout his career and in June 2010 launched a retrospective of his work in an exhibition in St. Paul de Vence. The exhibition included images of his music acquaintances, as well as famous artists from the South of France, including Marc Chagall.[24]

Wyman is also a supporter of his local football team, Crystal Palace.

[edit] Discography

[edit] Solo albums

  • Monkey Grip (June 1974) UK #39 [1 wk], US #99 [11 wks]
  • Stone Alone (March 1976) US #166 [5 wks]
  • Bill Wyman (April 1982) UK #55 [6 wks]
  • Willie & The Poor Boys (May 1985) US #96 [12 wks]
  • Stuff (October 1992 in Japan and Argentina only, 2000 UK)
  • A Stone Alone: The Solo Anthology 1974-2002 (2002, UK)

[edit] Bill Wyman's Rhythm Kings

  • Struttin' Our Stuff (October 1997)
  • Anyway The Wind Blows (February 1999)
  • Groovin' (May 2000) UK #52 [3 wks]
  • Double Bill (May 2001) UK #88 [2 wks]
  • Just For A Thrill (May 2004) UK #149 [1 wk]

[edit] Also plays on

[edit] Solo singles

  • "In Another Land" (December 1967) Peaked US #87
  • "(Si, Si) Je Suis Un Rock Star" (July 1981) UK #14 [9 wks]
  • " A New Fashion" (March 1982) UK #37 [4 wks]
  • "Baby Please Don't Go" (June 1985) US Mainstream Rock #35 [7 wks]

[edit] Bibliography

Bill Wyman has authored or co-authored the following titles

[edit] Archaeology

[edit] Rolling Stones

The latter three books and Bill Wyman's Treasure Islands were all written in collaboration with Richard Havers.

[edit] Art

Sunday, October 23, 2011

Jagger and lennon still fascinate New books examine two of rock's greatest figures...


Jagger and lennon still fascinate

New books examine two of rock's greatest figures

For several weeks now, one of the most popular songs in North America has been Maroon 5's Moves Like Jagger. The song itself is a trifle, unlikely to be remembered beyond its chart run, but its title conceit indicates that the Rolling Stones' lead singer endures as shorthand for a certain kind of cool.

Ask yourself this question, though: What's the most recent Rolling Stones song you can name? The Stones have so long been more a brand than a band that the only drama coming out of their camp has been provided by the tussle between Jagger and Keith Richards to represent their legacy. Richards, aided by his justly acclaimed autobiography Life, has been winning that fight decisively; now, in the absence of a riposte from Jagger himself, comes Marc Spitz's pro-Mick argument, Jagger: Rebel, Rock Star, Rambler, Rogue.

Appearances notwithstanding, the book is not so much a biography as a series of essays on pivotal Stones episodes of the past 50 years, all in aid of the thesis that the present perception of Jagger as a singing plutocrat is unwarranted. The trouble is that the case weakens as it proceeds. Spitz's best stretch of writing by some distance comes in his account of the 1964 TAMI Show, a filmed concert where the green young Stones were forced to follow a titanic performance by James Brown. Had they failed at such a crucial early juncture, there's a good chance that their career as we know it wouldn't have happened, but their singer's galvanic stage presence carried the day, and Spitz captures the moment well. He's much less convincing on Jagger's brief "radical" phase, when the singer took part in a 1968 ant-war demonstration in London's Grosvenor Square. With hindsight, there's no reason to think he did it for any reason other than a grab at street cred - he was back in the comfort of his Chelsea townhouse before the demonstration had even ended - and Spitz's case to the contrary rings hollow.

And so it goes, with ever-diminishing returns. Does anyone care, at this late date, about the implications of the Stones' choosing Living Colour as an opening act in 1988, or whether Jagger betrayed his "rebel" status by accepting a knighthood? It all seems so quaint somehow. None of which, of course, makes Exile on Main Street any less great. I think I'll play it right now.

John Lennon's life before, during and after the Beatles has been

told and retold so many times that it has taken on the quality of an epic ballad: You know what's coming, but it grips you anyway. It's a story rich and complex enough to support the strategies of any number of biographers: Albert Goldman's iconoclasm provided a useful corrective to a lot of post-death hagiographies, but was undermined by what felt like a hateful undertow; Philip Norman did protean research, but evinced a curious dispassion regarding the subject's music.

In Lennon: The Man, The Myth, the Music - The Definitive Life, author Tim Riley, whose Tell Me Why was the definitive song-by-song Beatles study until superseded by Ian Macdonald's Revolution in the Head, lands midway between those two poles. Clearly a fan, he's still at pains to show the sometimes unpleasant reality.

Lennon, as Riley shows, was always prone to swings between sensitive artist and plain bully, but once the Beatles' unprecedented fame placed him in a world where conventional standards of conduct were suspended, his behaviour was often appalling. There's no pretty spin to put on how he treated first wife, Cynthia, and neglected first son, Julian, nor for his habit of publicly humiliating his insecure, besotted manager, Brian Epstein. That lifelong conflict, Riley argues, can be traced essentially to a single event: the day in 1946 when the 6-year-old Lennon was forced to choose between his separated parents, a trauma followed by a youth and early manhood where the emancipation of rock and roll was counterbalanced by an astounding death rate among Lennon's intimates: between the ages of 17 and 26, he lost his mother, Julia; father figure George Smith; bandmate and best friend Stuart Sutcliffe; and Epstein. Riley identifies the subsequent dominant artistic impulse as the "funnelling of leftover grief" and illuminates the mingling of joy and pain that has made Lennon's work with and without the Beatles endlessly resonant.

Riley's book is longer than it probably needs to be - at times he gets caught up in Beatles lore and goes on tangents. But the life he recounts is so fecund, and his telling so balanced, eloquent and absorbing, that few are likely to complain. Riley has just leaped to the front of a very crowded field.

Jagger: Rebel, Rock Star, Rambler, Rogue ?By Marc Spitz ?Gotham Books/Penguin, 310 pages, $30

Lennon: The Man, The Myth, the Music - The Definitive Life ?By Tim Riley ?Hyperion, 765 pages, $35

Stones Concert Film...


It Only Took 33 Years For Dallas Filmmakers to Get Due Credit For "Lost" Stones Concert Film


RollingStonesSomeGirlsLiveInTexas1978.jpg
Jagger and Richards in Some Girls Live shot in Fort Worth
A reminder: Tonight and tonight only is that big-screen screening of The Rolling Stones: Some Girls Live In Texas, shot during the band's Will Rogers Auditorium stopover on July 18, 1978, under the moniker the "London Green Shoed Cowboys." It will screen simultaneously on 300 screens nationwide before going international, then making its way to home-video release in conjunction with the re-release of a souped-up Some Girls in November.

But here's a little-known fact -- little known, because it's not mentioned once in publicity materials dispatched in advance of the nationwide one-off tonight: Some Girls Live was directed by Dallas documentarian Lynn Lenau and her all-local crew of shooters, among them Phillip Thomas, the man holding the hand-held that was in Mick Jagger's face for the entirety of the show. On top of that, none of them knew the film was finally being released till, oh, three weeks ago.

"Not even then, really," says Lenau. She tells Unfair Park today she first heard about the film's release when a reporter from a New Zealand newspaper called to find out if she's the Lynn Lenau who shot the movie in 1978. She said yes, of course she was. "But why do you want to know?" she wondered.

"Because there's a rumor it's being re-released," he told her.

"And I told him, 'It's never been released,'" she recalls now, laughing.

The question is: Why not? Well, actually, that's just one of the questions surrounding a movie whose makers had no idea it was being released till days ago. Another question: Are they getting paid for it all these years later?

"No."

That's the short answer given by Jack Calmes, who, in 1978, was Lenau's husband -- and the man who made the film happen in the first place.

In 1978, Calmes was president of Showco, the famed lighting and sound company that brought rock and roll into the arenas for the likes of Led Zeppelin, the Who, ZZ Top, Van Halen and the Stones. Showco designed the stage for the Some Girls tour -- very film-noir, says Calmes, "very Dashiell Hammett." He thought it would make for one hell of a movie. That, and "I thought Some Girls was far and away the band's best record."

Back then, Calmes and Mick Jagger were tight, so much so that when the band got into Dallas for its Fort Worth gig, Calmes met Jagger at the Fairmont. They had plans: Bobby "Blue" Bland at the Longhorn Ballroom.

"We were the only two white guys in there," Calmes says. "I introduced Mick to Bobby and Al 'TNT' Braggs. Then we went back to the Fairmont, and I pitched him on the film. In those days, no one let cameras in close positions. Bands didn't let them onstage. It was a rock-and-roll taboo. They were all afraid of stuff getting pirated. I said to Mick, 'But you know all of us, this is a safe environment, and I've got the best guys together to do this.' And we also owned a 24-track recorder, so it was in sync with all five cameramen. All pros."

Six hours before showtime, Jagger finally agreed to let Calmes's crew shoot the show at Will Rogers. Theirs was a handshake deal. No paperwork was ever signed.

"And this will go down as the best one they ever did," Calmes said. "The show was just so ... unpretentious." He laughs."Mick was so hungover and fucked up from having been up with me all night till the next day, when he finally said yes."

There were a few details to be worked out, chief among them getting Jagger to let Thomas shoot him center-stage, from mere feet away. Jagger hated the idea of a camera in his face. He scoffed. He moaned. He said no many times.

"Jack spent all night trying to talk Mick into letting me be there," says Thomas, who served as the film's director of photography. "Lynn says she did it. Jack says he did it. But nonetheless, part of the agreement came down to: If I was hand-held, then he'd let me be there. There was a little runway that came off the stage -- 20 to 30 feet long, six-feet wide. I was standing right on the first row, and he was four, five feet away from me. I'm looking straight up at him."

Lenau then spent the next few months editing footage. She and Calmes, who divorced long ago, screened the film in Dallas a few times. Then they took a cut featuring five songs to Los Angeles, where ads promoting the film began appearing in trade mags and on billboards.

"We had a screening in a sound stage in old Hollywood, which was the first time I even talked to Mick," Lenau says. "He was concerned. It was one show. It wasn't like where you shot five concerts and picked the best from each one. And I heard they thought they looked too old. But I told him we could clean some stuff up if they gave me more time."

Eventually, she and Calmes say separately, one of the Stones' reps told them: Hand over the film. It's going on the shelf. Forever.

"I just felt if they gave me a little more time ..." Lenau says. "Because it was good."

Decades passed. Calmes's Showco morphed into Syncrolite; he still works with the Stones, matter of fact, lighting all the band's tours. He and Lynn split; 15 years ago, she gave up filmmaking and editing and started her own landscaping business. Thomas continues to work in the film business. Everyone had given up on the film ever being released. They forgot all about it. Till, that is, a few weeks ago.

When Calmes got wind of it, he reached out to the Stones via email. He wanted to make sure his ex and her crew were properly credited. He also wanted to make sure they were all getting paid, because far as anyone recalls, maybe they made a collective $1,000 for their work in July 1978. (Calmes says the Stones also reimbursed him for renting the film equipment -- $10,000, if that.) Calmes says he's heard from Jagger that they'll get some kind of credit; money remains an entirely separate issue.

"It's called rock-star amnesia," Calmes says. "And I heard back from Mick: 'We'll give you some kind of credit.' But there's no excuse for them not remembering. This wasn't a situation where you'd forget, even if you're a rock star. I worked on him relentlessly for a long time to let us shoot this film."

Calmes isn't out to bad-mouth his old friend, but "I didn't do this for my health," he says. "I thought it would be a great piece of work, and really wanted to make something of it, but the deal was if he didn't want to do it, it was his call. I told Mick [via email], 'As I remember it, it was a handshake deal. If something happened in the future we'd discuss it.' And something happened -- 34 years later. And that's a long time. But you don't forget something this monumental."

Lenau and Thomas and others who worked on the film are planning on attending tonight's screening at the Cinemark West Plano off the Dallas North Tollway; so too is Calmes's former partner Angus Wynne and old friends who attended the small show. Thomas is excited to see it.

"They shelved it because they looked old," he says. "Now, of course, they actually look old, and they went back and saw how bitching and bad-ass and cool they were back then and said, 'Wow, we don't have baggy eyes, gray hair, and we're skinny as shit.'"

Lenau, though, she's a little more ... apprehensive. Because she doesn't even know what her movie looks like anymore. "I could go to parties while I was editing and had Mick Jagger down," she says. "People cheered. And I listened to all the music over and over again." But she hasn't seen it in decades. And she's not even sure whether the film that screens tonight bears any resemblance to her cut.

"I have heard my name is on it," she says. "I heard that from Jack. We have a friend who saw it in London. And this is fun. I'm glad it happened finally. It'll bring a bunch of people together at one time who haven't seen each other in a long time. All these people will be together tonight to see it, and that's what is important. And I have the other side of me that wants it to be good, that doesn't want it to be MTV-ish. I just want it to be like it was."


BILL WYMAN AND MARY WILSON.!




Review: Bill Wyman's Rhythm Kings and Mary Wilson at Southport Theatre
by Guest


AN impressive crowd ventured onto a Promenade battered by gales and lashed rain to see the most talented member of the Rolling Stones, accompanied by his eight-piece all-star band, the Rhythm Kings.

Bill Wyman wandered onstage to explain they would be playing an eclectic selection of music ranging across the fields of jazz, blues, standards, R & B, rockabilly, soul, skiffle and rock’n’roll.

The show opened with George Fame playing a few bars of Gracie Field’s ‘Sally’, insisting he came from Leigh not Rochdale and he used to come to Southport for his holidays as a kid.

Highspots for me were England’s top guitarist, Albert Lee, turning to skiffle for ‘Muleskinner Blues’; Shakin’ Stevens’ ex-keyboard player, Geraint Watkins, with a soulful version of Irma Thomas’s ‘It’s Raining’; the glamorous Beverly Skeete performing a great version of Jackie Wilson’s ‘I’ll be Satisfied’ and Mary Wilson, making a quick return to Southport, sounding as good as Diana Ross on three old Supremes hits.

The first half of the show, which closed with the quietly watching Wyman stepping into the limelight to sing Chuck Berry’s ‘You Never Can Tell’, then the second half followed the same pattern except Mary Wilson chose to do numbers from her new CD as a change, she said, from her Motown days. The finale came far too soon with Mary Wilson leading the band in a rousing version of ‘Dancing in the Street’ and the crowd were shouting for more as the lights came up.

It was the pop music equivalent of a classical concert played by as talented a group of musicians as you would find anywhere in Britain.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

SuperHeavy more like a super-duper group The problem with supergroups is there are so many superegos at play and the union's...


SUPER HEAVY MORE LIKE A SUPER-DUPER GROUP.THE PROBLEM WITH SUPERGROUPS IS THERE ARE SO MANY SUPEREGOS AT PLAY AND THE UNION'S RESULT ARE OFTEN UNDERWHELMING.


How many solo artists does it take to change a light bulb? Well, none, obviously, because they'd just get someone from the backing band to do it.

It is hard to imagine what Mick Jagger, Joss Stone, Damian Marley, Dave Stewart and Indian superstar composer A.R. Rahman had in mind when they decided to join forces, but presumably it did not involve maintenance of lighting fixtures. Three lead vocalists and a couple of multiinstrumentalists, all distinctive and established singer-songwriters and stars in their own right across diverse musical genres: it sounds like a recipe for ... well, not quite disaster, perhaps, but certainly an overcooked broth of conflicting styles and egos. A supergroup, in other words.

As if to emphasize their own blockbuster billing, this starry quintet of rock, raga, reggae, soul and electronic pop legends have called themselves SuperHeavy. An album of the same name was recently released, and perhaps the most surprising thing about it is that it's actually not a complete mess, enthusiastically mashing up global beats with pop melodies and zesty vocals.

The supergroup genre has not exactly covered itself in glory, being heavily weighted toward mercenary amalgamations of underemployed musicians from established bands whose motivation seems to be extending lucrative franchises after the original group members have all fallen out with each other.

In the '70s, a supergroup would typically combine members of Free, Mott the Hoople and King Crimson (Bad Company); these days, they usually include at least one member of Guns N' Roses with various grunge and heavy metal sidemen (Velvet Revolver, Neurotic Outsiders).

The very word supergroup is something of a misnomer. You could use a lot of adjectives to describe the Greedy Bastards, in which members of Thin Lizzy briefly united in 1980 for a Christmas single and short tour to fuel their hard-drug habits, but I don't think "super" would be among them.

At its best, however, the idea of the supergroup is an honourable one, an opportunity for the top musicians in their respective fields to combine creative forces. Cream were arguably the first and greatest supergroup, their very name reflecting guitarist Eric Clapton, drummer Ginger Baker and bassist Jack Bruce's status as "the cream of the crop" among blues and jazz musicians on the '60s U.K. live scene.

Their brief, explosive career (four albums between 1966 and 1968) reflects the underlying problem with supergroups - superegos. The intense musical gladiatorial battles on stage were matched by less appealing squabbling in the dressing room. Even a well-intended reunion in 2005 was spoiled for Clapton by Baker and Bruce's incessant arguments. "Life's too short," Clapton complained. "I've got a lot of things I'd rather do, including staying at home with my kids." This, to be honest, is how I feel about most supergroups.

The '70s was the era of the supergroup, as the first wave of rock bands broke up and reconfigured in new lineups that sounded more like legal firms than bands: Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young, or Emerson, Lake and Palmer. Heavy rock seems particularly prone to the syndrome, with members of Black Sabbath, Deep Purple, Free and Led Zeppelin revolving around each other as if engaged in a never-ending game of musical chairs. But there have been indie supergroups (Electronica featured members of the Smiths, New Order and Pet Shop Boys), singer-songwriter supergroups (the Travelling Wilburys managed to take the stellar talents of George Harrison, Bob Dylan, Tom Petty, Roy Orbison and Jeff Lynne and produce two albums of flippant, forgettable country rock) and alt rock supergroups (anything involving Jack White of White Stripes fame).

Has any supergroup, though, boasted a lineup quite as spectacularly peculiar as SuperHeavy? This is more like a superduper group.

Arguably, most bands of this type sound better in theory than in practice.

The Dirty Mac should have been the ultimate rock lineup, featuring John Lennon on guitar and vocals, Clapton on lead, Keith Richards on bass and Mitch Mitchell of the Jimi Hendrix Experience on drums.

But their one-night performance at the Rolling Stones' Rock and Roll Circus in 1968 illustrated all of the problems with such concoctions: under-rehearsed, overconfident and ill-matched, they were inevitably less than the sum of their parts.

And then, just when it's beginning to jell, Yoko Ono jumps out of a black bag and starts wailing in a different key to everyone else.

At least that's one problem SuperHeavy won't have to deal with.

Friday, October 21, 2011

STONES PERFORMANCE IN 'FORT WORTH'

Concert film captures the Stones' 1978 performance in Fort Worth

Posted 11:53pm on Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2011

"Quite intense" is how Mick Jagger remembers the summer of 1978.

His band, the Rolling Stones, had just released Some Girls, a follow-up to 1976's Black and Blue, and was touring America for the first time in three years. It was nearing the end of the Exile on Main Street era, a tumultuous period of drug problems, tax dilemmas and intra-band squabbles.

The '78 schedule wasn't too grueling -- 25 dates in two months, including a July 18 stop at Fort Worth's Will Rogers Memorial Auditorium -- but, of course, the offstage antics were enough to bring even the hardiest rock stars nearly to their knees.

It's the wearied yet exhilarated faces that stick with you the most in the new concert film Some Girls Live in Texas, which screened nationally Tuesday.

Captured by a Dallas film crew but officially unreleased for the better part of three decades, this document of a band near its prime is being released Nov. 21 on Blu-ray and DVD in conjunction with a reissue of Some Girls.

The remastered film, decked out with an immaculate image and a roaring soundtrack, was preceded by a 15-minute interview with Jagger, which was filmed in August with journalist Paul Sexton.

Sexton prefaced his chat with a few clips from the '78 Fort Worth gig. Cutting from the youthful, lascivious Jagger to the extremely well-worn, modern-day version was downright shocking.

"It's not sloppy," Jagger said of the Fort Worth show. "Everyone's having fun, but you can see they're concentrating."

And indeed, there's an almost workmanlike feel to the set list, which pulled heavily from the then-fresh Some Girls. The core group (Jagger, Keith Richards, Charlie Watts, Ronnie Wood and Bill Wyman) was augmented by pros like Ian McLagan. In a neat twist, several of the smaller shows, including Fort Worth, were performed under a pseudonym, the London Greenshoe Cowboys.

But that gimmick was the only one in sight (a far cry from the Stones' later years). Powered by the phenomenal Some Girls (which produced classics like Beast of Burden), the Stones appear burned-out but rock-solid throughout the performance, which swings from punk-inspired fury ( Shattered) to beautifully battered country ( Far Away Eyes).

A visceral document of an era lost to memory, Jagger fairly understated the electricity generated by the Stones: "This particular era was, musically, very interesting."

Preston Jones is the Star-Telegram pop music critic. 817-390-7713